|
HOUSING
LAW NEWS & POLICY ISSUES
|
|
Queen’s Speech
On 11 May 2021, the Queen outlined the
Government’s legislative plans for the
next session of Parliament. They
include:
- A Planning Bill
- A Building Safety Bill
- A Judicial Review Bill
- A Leasehold Reform Bill
More details of the planned legislation
will be provided in coming days. For
coverage in the Guardian of
the Queen’s Speech, click
here. For coverage on
BBC News, click
here.
Fire Safety Act 2021
On 29 April 2021 the Fire
Safety Bill received Royal Assent. The
Fire Safety Act amends the Regulatory
Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. It aims
to make it clearer where responsibility
for fire safety lies in buildings
containing more than one home. The 2005
Order brought together different pieces
of fire legislation. It applies to all
non-domestic premises, including
communal areas of residential buildings
with multiple homes. The Order
designates those in control of premises
as the responsible person for fire
safety and they have a duty to undertake
assessments and manage risks. The Order
is enforced by Fire and Rescue
Authorities. The Act clarifies that for
any building containing two or more sets
of domestic premises the Order applies
to the building’s structure and external
walls and any common parts, including
the front doors of residential areas. It
also clarifies that references to
external walls in the Order include
“doors or windows in those walls” and
“anything attached to the exterior of
those walls (including balconies)”.
These amendments to the Order aim to
increase enforcement action in these
areas, particularly where remediation of
aluminium composite material (ACM)
cladding is not taking place. In the
late stages of the passage of the
legislation, the Government resisted an
amendment to the Bill intended to
protect leaseholders living in
unsellable and potentially dangerous
high-rise homes, saying that the
amendment was too widely drawn. For the
Act, click
here. For coverage of
the attempted amendment, click
here.
Cladding loan scheme
On 29 April 2021 the Commons Housing,
Communities and Local Government
Committee published a follow-up report
on cladding urging the Government to
re-commit to the principle that
leaseholders should not have to pay for
the removal of unsafe cladding from
their homes. It also called on the
Government to establish a Comprehensive
Building Safety Fund that addresses the
true scale of fire safety issues.
Finance for the fund should be provided
by Government and the building industry.
For the report, click
here.
Domestic Abuse Act 2021
On 29 April 2021 the Domestic Abuse Bill
received Royal Assent. For the first
time there will be a wide-ranging legal
definition of domestic abuse which
incorporates a range of abuses beyond
physical violence, including emotional,
coercive or controlling behaviour, and
economic abuse. The measures include new
protections and support for victims
ensuring that abusers will no longer be
allowed to directly cross-examine their
victims in the family and civil courts,
and giving victims better access to
special measures in the courtroom to
help prevent intimidation, such as
protective screens and giving evidence
via video link. Police will also be
given new powers including Domestic
Abuse Protection Notices providing
victims with immediate protection from
abusers, while courts will be able to
hand out new Domestic Abuse Protection
Orders to help prevent offending by
forcing perpetrators to take steps to
change their behaviour, including
seeking mental health support or drug
and alcohol rehabilitation.
Other measures included in the Act
include:
- extending the controlling or
coercive behaviour offence to cover
post-separation abuse
- explicitly recognise children as
victims if they see, hear or
experience the effects of abuse
- establish in law the office of
Domestic Abuse Commissioner and set
out the Commissioner's functions and
powers
- placing a duty on local authorities
in England to provide support to
victims of domestic abuse and their
children in refuges and other safe
accommodation
- provide that all eligible homeless
victims of domestic abuse
automatically have 'priority need' for
homelessness assistance
- place the guidance supporting the
Domestic Violence Disclosure Scheme
("Clare's law") on a statutory
footing.
For the Act, click
here.
Judicial Review Practice
Directions issued
On 7 May 2021 a suite of Practice
Directions was published, supplementing
CPR Part 54 (Judicial Review). The
Practice Directions have been revised in
consequence of developments in caselaw
and practice and come into force on 31
May 2021. A revised suite of Judicial
Review forms in consequence of the
reformed PDs supplementing CPR Part 54
will be published online (gov.uk) in due
course. For the Practice Directions, click
here.
Housing Benefit and Universal
Credit (Care Leavers and Homeless)
(Amendment) Regulations 2021
These Regulations, which come
into force on 31 May 2021, amend the
Housing Benefit Regulations 2006 (the
Housing Benefit Regulations) and the
Universal Credit Regulations 2013 (the
Universal Credit Regulations). They
extend the age ranges of the exemptions
from the shared accommodation rate of
the Local Housing Allowance which apply
to care leavers and those who have spent
at least three months in a homeless
hostel whilst receiving support to
assist with community resettlement or
rehabilitation. For the Regulations, click
here.
Housing Possession Court Duty
Scheme – Slough
On 6 May 2021 a tender for the Housing
Possession Court Duty Scheme (HPCDS) in
Slough opened and will close on 7 June
2021. This opportunity is open to all
2018 Standard Civil Contract holders
currently delivering housing and debt
services. The Legal Aid Agency is
offering one contract for the Slough
HPCDS. For more details, click
here.
Social housing lettings in
England: April 2019 to March 2020
On 29 April 2021 the MHCLG published
statistics on new social housing
lettings in England provided by local
authorities and private registered
providers. Between April 2019 and March
2020:
- There were 306,000 new social
housing lettings, a decrease of 2.5
per cent or 8,000 lets from the
previous year. This was driven by
social rent tenancies which comprise
the majority of new lets, whilst use
of Affordable Rent products rose.
- New social housing lettings
decreased by 17 per cent whilst stock
increased by 3 per cent over the past
decade.
- 59 per cent of new social housing
lettings in 2019/20 were to tenants
not in social housing immediately
prior.
- There were 1.15 million households
on local authority waiting lists on 31
March 2020, a slight decrease of 1 per
cent from 1.16 million in 2018/19.
Over half of households (58 per cent)
with a new social letting in 2019/20
were on the waiting list in that area
for less than a year.
- 18 per cent of new lettings in
2019/20 were to statutorily homeless
households.
- Lifetime tenancies comprised nearly
three-quarters of new social lettings
in 2019/20, mostly by local
authorities.
- Households in a new social letting
in 2019/20 spent 36 per cent of their
income on rent, with an average
(median) rent of £81 per week.
For the full statistics, click
here.
‘No fault’ section 21 evictions
On 6 May 2021 the House of Commons
Library published a paper explaining the
use of section 21 and reactions to its
proposed abolition. The Government has
committed to abolish 'no-fault' section
21 evictions in the private rented
sector. A Renters' Reform Bill was
promised in the 2019 Queen's Speech to
achieve this. The Bill is awaited. For
the paper, click
here.
Forces Help to Buy Scheme
quarterly statistics: 2020/21
On 29 April 2021 the Ministry
of Defence published statistics on
applications, payments and purchases
made under the Forces Help to Buy (FHTB)
scheme. Since the Scheme began in April
2014:
- 56,540 First Stage FHTB applications
have been received.
- 28,296 of these applications have
proceeded to the Second Stage.
- Payment have been made to around
24,100 applicants, totalling around
£366 million, an average of
approximately £15,200 per claim.
- At least 95 per cent of payments, as
at 31 March 2021, have already
resulted in a purchased property or
extension.
For the full statistics, click
here.
Removing rough sleepers from UK
On 7 May 2021 60 homelessness and human
rights organisations issued a joint
statement condemning UK Government plans
to use rough sleeping as grounds for
removing someone from the country,
warning the policy makes non-UK
nationals in vulnerable circumstances
even more reluctant to accept help. The
charities said the policy puts people at
risk of exploitative work and
potentially modern slavery, to avoid
sleeping rough and putting their
immigration status at risk. For the
statement, click
here. For the
Government’s guidance, click
here.
Rough sleepers in third lockdown
– London
On 30 April 2021 the Combined
Homelessness and Information Network
(CHAIN) revealed that from January to
March 2021, 3,002 people slept rough
across London, this was down 9 per cent
on the previous quarter, while 1,567
slept rough for the first time during
this period. The figures also show:
- 33 per cent of people rough sleeping
had two or more support needs
- 1,587 people were placed in
emergency accommodation; this is up 72
per cent from the last quarter. This
reflects the work of local authorities
and the Greater London Authority to
continue to accommodate people
sleeping rough during the pandemic.
For more details and the response of
Crisis, click
here.
Homes for older people
On 5 May 2021 a new online
survey commissioned by the Good Home
Inquiry revealed that the majority (63
per cent) of people approaching later
life in England see home renovations as
a priority in the next two years. But
half of those aged 50-70 polled said the
main reason they would not be able to
carry out all the renovations they say
are a priority is because they cannot
afford it. For more information, click
here.
Breathing Space and Mental
Health Crisis Debt Respite Schemes
From 4 May 2021 the Breathing Space and
Mental Health Crisis Debt Respite
Schemes came into effect in England and
Wales. Breathing Space is a new scheme
that gives people temporary protection
from most types of debt collection while
they take action to get on top of their
debts. They can apply through a debt
adviser for sixty days’ Breathing Space.
They must continue to engage with their
debt adviser and not take out any new
borrowing over £500 in this time. They
also have to continue to make certain
types of payments, including ongoing
housing costs, utility bills, and taxes.
For information from Citizens Advice, click
here and
see the next item.
Assured Tenancies and
Agricultural Occupancies (Forms)
(Moratorium Debt) (Consequential
Amendment) (England) Regulations 2021
These Regulations, which came
into force on 4 May 2021 immediately
after the coming into force of the Debt
Respite Scheme (Breathing Space
Moratorium and Mental Health Crisis
Moratorium) (England and Wales)
Regulations 2020 (the Moratorium
Regulations), amend the Assured
Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies
(Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (the
principal Regulations).
The Regulations are consequential on the
coming into force of the Moratorium
Regulations which establishes a scheme
which will give someone in problem debt
the right to legal protections from
their creditors for a period of 60 days
in the case of a breathing space
moratorium or, in the case of a mental
health crisis moratorium, the duration
of the mental health crisis treatment
plus 30 days. In particular, it pauses
any enforcement action such as serving a
notice of intention to seek possession
of the rented property. These
Regulations amend Form No. 3 in the
Schedule to the principal Regulations to
insert a reference to the legal
protections offered by virtue of the
Moratorium Regulations into that Form.
For the 2021 Regulations, click
here. For the updated
form, click
here. For a note by
Giles Peaker concerning the form, click
here.
Grenfell Tower Inquiry update
On 30 April 2021 the Grenfell Tower
Inquiry published its April newsletter.
It provides a digest of: resumption of
limited attendance hearings; Module 3
factsheet; Inquiry financial report;
disclosure figures; Core Participant
figures; support arrangements during
limited attendance hearings; and contact
information. For the update, click
here.
|
|
HOUSING
LAWS IN THE PIPELINE
|
|
Fire Safety Act 2021
This Act makes provision
about the application of the Regulatory
Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 where a
building contains two or more sets of
domestic premises; and confers power to
amend that order in future for the
purposes of changing the premises to
which it applies. The Bill received
Royal Assent on 29 April 2021. For the
Act, click
here. To read debates
on all stages of the bill, click
here. For a briefing
paper, published by the House of Commons
Library on 19 March 2021, click
here. For more details
of the Act, see Housing Law News
and Policy Issues (above).
The following Bills failed
to complete their passage through
Parliament before the end of the
session. This means that each Bill
will make no
further progress.
Vagrancy (Repeal) Bill
This private member’s bill, sponsored by
Layla Moran, would have repealed the
Vagrancy Act 1824. It received its first
reading in the ouseHouse of Commons on
18 March 2020.
Sublet Property (Offences)
Bill
This private member’s bill,
sponsored by Sir Christopher Chope,
would have made the breach of certain
rules relating to sub-letting rented
accommodation a criminal offence and
would have made provision for criminal
sanctions in respect of unauthorised
sub-letting. It received its first
reading on 10 February 2020.
Supported Accommodation
Bill
This private member’s bill, sponsored by
Steve McCabe, would have required
developers to disclose for planning
purposes an intention to use a building
for supported housing or other
accommodation that is specified for the
purposes of Universal Credit and Housing
Benefit; established a suitability test
for accommodation proposed for such use;
and made provision about the fitness of
persons to be landlords or managers of
supported or other specified
accommodation. The bill had its first
reading on 18 November 2020.
Supported Housing
(Regulation) Bill
This private member's bill, sponsored by
Kerry McCarthy, would have regulated
supported housing; made provision about
local authority oversight and the
enforcement of standards of
accommodation and support in supported
housing; and prohibited the placing of
children in care in unregulated
accommodation. It received its first
reading on 11 November 2020.
Mobile Homes and Park Homes
Bill
This private members’ bill, sponsored by
Sir Christopher Chope, would have
required the use of published criteria
to determine whether mobile homes and
park homes are liable for council tax or
non-domestic rates; made provision in
relation to the residential status of
such homes; and amended the Mobile Home
Acts. It received its first reading in
the House of Commons on 10 February
2020.
Mobile Homes Act 1983
(Amendment) Bill
This private member’s bill, sponsored by
Sir Christopher Chope, sought to amend
the Mobile Homes Act 1983. It received
its first reading in the House of
Commons on 10 February 2020.
Rented Homes Bill
This private member’s bill, sponsored by
Baroness Grender, would have amended the
Housing Act 1988 to abolish assured
shorthold tenancies; and extended the
grounds upon which landlords of
residential housing may recover
possession. First reading took place on
22 January 2020.
Housing and Homelessness
(Local Accommodation Duty) Bill
This private member’s bill, sponsored by
Karen Buck, would have placed a duty on
local authorities to ensure that persons
for whom a homeless duty has been
accepted are accommodated in the local
area, including on discharge into
private rented accommodation; and would
have required local authorities to
publish annual reports on steps relating
to housing demand and supply taken or
intended to be taken to meet that duty.
The bill had its first reading on 8
March 2021.
Housing Act 2004
(Amendment) Bill
This private members’ bill, sponsored by
Sir Christopher Chope, sought to amend
Part 3 of the Housing Act 2004 to
provide that any selective licensing
scheme for residential accommodation
extends to social housing. It received
its first reading on 10 February 2020.
Houses in Multiple
Occupation Bill
This private member’s
bill, sponsored by Ian Levy, would have
amended the law relating to the
licensing of houses in multiple
occupation and increased penalties for
the contravention of such licences. The
bill received its first reading on 9
September 2020.
Homeless People (Current
Accounts) Bill
This private member’s bill, sponsored by
Peter Bone, would have required banks to
provide current accounts for homeless
people seeking work. It received its
first reading in the House of Commons on
10 February 2020.
Evictions (Universal Credit
Claimants) Bill
This private member’s bill, sponsored by
Chris Stephens, sought to place a duty
on the Secretary of State to prevent the
evictions of Universal Credit claimants
in rent arrears. It received its first
reading in the House of Commons on 10
February 2020.
Domestic Properties
(Minimum Energy Performance) Bill
This private member’s
bill, sponsored by Sir David Amess,
would require the Secretary of State to
ensure that domestic properties have a
minimum energy performance rating of C
on an Energy Performance Certificate; to
give the Secretary of State powers to
require persons to take action in
pursuance of that duty. The first
reading was on 14 July 2020.
Caravan Sites Bill
This private member’s bill,
sponsored by Sir Christopher Chope,
would have amended the Caravan Sites and
Control of Development Act 1960 to
remove planning permission requirements
for caravan site licence applicants. It
received its first reading in the House
of Commons on 10 February 2020.
Asylum Seekers
(Accommodation Eviction Procedures)
Bill
This private member’s
bill, sponsored by Chris Stephens, would
make provision for asylum seekers to
challenge the proportionality of a
proposed eviction from accommodation
before an independent court or tribunal
and would establish asylum seeker
accommodation eviction procedures for
public authorities. The first reading
was on 10 February 2020.
Domestic Premises (Energy
Performance) Bill
This private member’s bill, sponsored by
Lord Foster of Bath, would have required
the Secretary of State to ensure that
domestic properties have a minimum
energy performance rating of C on an
Energy Performance Certificate; and to
make provision regarding performance and
insulation of new heating systems in
existing properties. The first reading
was on 8 January 2020.
|
|
Make
Sure you Keep Up to Date
with Housing Law Week
Don’t
miss out on
your weekly
updates!
Sign
up here now
to ensure you
receive your
own free copy
of Housing
Law Week
straight to
your desktop
each week.
|
|
|
|
|
R (On the Application Of
Elkundi & Ors) v Birmingham City
Council [2021]
EWHC 1024 (Admin) (23 April 2021)
The four claimants had each applied to
Birmingham City Council (“the Council”)
for accommodation under the homelessness
provisions contained in Part VII of the
Housing Act 1996 (“HA 1996”).
Each of the claimants alleged the
Council was in breach of its duty to
them under section 193(2) to secure
suitable accommodation available for
their occupation (Ground 1). This was
the sole ground of challenge in Elkundi
and Ross.
In Ahmed and Al Shameri,
the claimants further alleged that the
Council had adopted an unlawful informal
system whereby it would accept that
accommodation was unsuitable within the
meaning of sections 206(1) and 210 HA
1996 but then go on to say that the
accommodation was not unreasonable for
continued occupation, over an inherently
uncertain timescale, until alternative
accommodation could be provided (Ground
2).
Ground 3 related solely to the case of Al
Shameri, it being alleged that
the Council had acted in breach of the
claimant’s legitimate expectation that
he would be made an offer of suitable
accommodation.
The claimants succeeded on Ground 1
(save to the extent indicated in Mr
Al-Shameri’s case) and Ground 2. Ground
3 was dismissed.
Judgment
In analysing the duty under s.193(2) the
court agreed with the position of the
claimants that the duty is triggered as
soon as it is found to be owed and is
not a qualified duty to provide
reasonable steps [169].
The court assessed the previous case law
regarding the nature of the duty under
s.193(2) and agreed with the position of
Linden J in M v Newham in
relation to the judgments in both Anderson
and Sembi that in the previous
cases, the courts had mistakenly looked
at the s193(2) duty as one to provide
permanent accommodation, when it can be
discharged by providing suitable
temporary accommodation.
The court then held that Auld LJ in Codona
did not find that the duty is qualified
with the words “in a reasonable time”
though the court will not force an
authority to do the impossible [201].
Finally, the court looked at Aweys
/ Birmingham v Ali. It was noted
that those cases were argued on the
basis that accommodation which it was
not reasonable to continue to occupy
could not, in principle, be suitable
accommodation. Given this, the detailed
facts of their respective cases were not
assessed. The court therefore concluded
that the lack of a finding of breach did
not show that the duty is to secure
suitable accommodation within a
reasonable time [224]. The court
again referred to the elasticity
afforded by the term “suitable
accommodation” as providing the
sufficient flexibility, rather than any
qualification of the duty.
The court then turned to the review
decisions regarding suitability of the
accommodation in each of the cases of
Elkundi, Ahmed and Ross. The court found
that on the particular facts of each
case the outcomes of the reviews were
that the housing was unsuitable. The
Council was therefore in breach of its
s.193(2) duty from the time of its
finding the accommodation unsuitable
[284].
The court considered the impact of
limited housing stock and financial
constraints. It found that these may
have a bearing upon what is deemed to be
suitable. Nevertheless, once it has been
determined, as it was in these three
cases, that accommodation secured for an
applicant who is owed the main housing
duty is unsuitable, lack of housing
stock and lack of resources provide no
defence [285].
In Mr Al-Shameri’s case, the letter sent
to Mr Al-Shameri did not address
suitability, only his status as
homeless. The Council sought to argue
that he had waived his right to be
provided with temporary accommodation,
choosing instead to remain homeless at
home, until he later requested temporary
accommodation [287]. The court rejected
this, finding that the letter sent was
unclear [292] and that Mr Al-Shameri did
not choose on a fully informed basis to
give up his right to temporary
accommodation [293-294]. The court
therefore found that Mr Al-Shameri was
also owed the unqualified duty under
s.193(2).
On 28 September 2020, the Council
determined that the property was
suitable for Mr Al-Shameri’s household
whilst alternative accommodation was
sought. The claimant did not seek review
of the decision despite his family’s
accommodation difficulties worsening.
Taking into account that the Council
believed at this time that the family
had chosen to remain homeless at home,
the court concluded it was not
irrational to decide that it was
suitable for the family to remain in
their home for a few more weeks. There
was therefore no breach between 28
September 2020 and 23 November 2020
[297] when an offer of accommodation was
made to Mr Al-Shameri.
The court then turned to the letter sent
to Mr Al-Shameri on 28.04.18 and found
that its wording did not give rise to
any legitimate expectation of re-housing
[304].
The court then drew the following
conclusions on the overall system
operated by the Council:
1. The Council had operated on
the basis that an applicant may remain
in unsuitable accommodation for a
“reasonable time” without the Council
breaching s.193(2). This
misunderstanding of the nature of the
duty has resulted in the Council
operating an unlawful system for the
performance of its duty under s.193(2)
[307].
2. Putting applicants who are
owed the s.193(2) duty, and who are in
unsuitable accommodation, on a waiting
list for temporary accommodation is not
a lawful means of fulfilling the
unqualified and immediate duty to secure
suitable accommodation for their
occupation [308].
3. If applicants are placed in
the queue by reference to the date on
which they joined the PML, the system
does not operate rationally [309].
4. In a case involving a
protected characteristic, such as
disability, there has to be recognition
that the applicant may need to be
treated more favourably than others
[310].
5. If the “Days Waiting”
represent days since the applicant was
placed on the PML, as the Council
submits, then it would be evident that
the Council is, in many cases, failing
to comply with the s.193(2) duty for
years [311].
6. If the order of the queue is
based on the date on which the applicant
first made a homeless application,
rather than the date of joining the PML,
the system would still operate
irrationally [312].
7. Even if the Council was
correct that the s.193(2) duty affords a
reasonable time to find suitable
accommodation, the system in place would
fail lawfully to meet such a duty
because no thought goes into the
question what period is reasonable in
the individual case [313].
The court granted mandatory orders in Elkundi
and Ahmed giving the Council
12 weeks to secure suitable
accommodation in accordance with section
193(2). In Ross, the court
found that though the Council was in
breach of its section 193(2) duty
towards Mrs Ross, and she is entitled to
a declaration to that effect, the
Council had been taking all reasonable
steps to secure suitable accommodation
and it would be unreasonable for the
court to enforce the duty via an order.
Summary by Parissa
Najah, barrister, Trinity
Chambers. For the
judgment, click
here.
|
|
HOUSING
LAW CONSULTATIONS
|
|
Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016
Draft Regulations
The Welsh Government is consulting on:
- draft model written statements
regulations, including the design,
structure and order of the model
written statements
- draft explanatory information
regulations for written statements.
The consultation ends on 16
June 2021. For the
consultation document, click
here. For the draft
regulations, click
here.
|
|
NEW
HOUSING LAW ARTICLES & PUBLICATIONS
|
|
The Guardian view on the
cladding scandal: don’t punish the
innocent Editorial Guardian
28 April 2021 – to read the article, click
here
Sparks Flying: Increasing
Network Connectivity For Tenants Lillee
Reid-Hunt, James Nelson and Natasha
Barlow Local Government Lawyer
29 April 2021 – to read the article, click
here
Housing case law update –
April 2021 Christopher
Skinner, Rebecca Asady and Filip Bodnar
Local Government Lawyer 5 May
2021 – to read the article, click
here
Notices and statutory
nuisances Sarah
Salmon Local Government Lawyer
5 May 2021 – to read the article, click
here
The Queen's Speech 2021 Ami
McCarthy Shelter Blog 7 May
2021 – to read the article, click
here
Good jobs and stable homes –
a platform for building a better
life Katie Schmuecker
Joseph Rowntree Foundation 7
May 2021 – to read the article, click
here
Rent arrears put thousands at risk
as end of eviction ban in England
looms Hilary Osborne
Observer 8 May 2021 – to read
the article, click
here
Service charge miscellany
Giles Peaker Nearly Legal 9
May 2021 – to read the article, click
here
Rent Repayment Order and
legal costs Giles
Peaker Nearly Legal 9 May 2021
– to read the article, click
here
Dying Matters: Have your say
Miranda Keast Homeless
Link 10 May 2021 – to read the
article, click
here
Covid and Rent Arrears Amy
Tagoe msbSolicitors May 2021
– to read the article, click
here
Owner-occupiers: review 2021
(May 21) Dave Cowan Legal
Action May 2021 – to read the
article (subscription required), click
here
Housing: recent developments
(May 21) Sam
Madge-Wyld and Jan Luba QC Legal
Action May 2021 – to read the
article (subscription required), click
here
|
|
31 May 2021
End of ban on evictions from
residential tenancies
|
31 May 2021
New Judicial Review Practice
Directions come into force
(see Housing Law News and Policy Issues)
|
31 May 2021
Housing Benefit and Universal
Credit (Care Leavers and Homeless)
(Amendment) Regulations 2021 come into
force
(see Housing Law News and Policy Issues)
|
|
Advertise
your vacancy to Housing Law Week
Readers
Send
details of the vacancy and a link to
the vacancy on your website to info@limelegal.co.uk
|
|
Private
Sector Housing Officer
|
|
|
|
Tenancy
Assistant
|
Great
Yarmouth Borough Council
Click
here and
scroll for details
|
|
|
Temporary
Accommodation Housing Officer
|
London
Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Click
here for
details
|
|
|
Homelessness
Prevention and Rough Sleeping
Commissioning Manager
|
London
Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Click
here for details
|
|
|
Rent
Collection & Arrears Recovery
Officer
|
|
|
|
Tenancy
Management Team Leader
|
|
|
|
Tenancy
Sustainment Officer (Part Time)
|
Oxford
City Council
Click
here and scroll for
details
|
|
|
Housing
Assistant
|
Royal
Borough of Kingston and Chelsea
Click
here for details
|
|
|
Senior
Private Rented Standards Officer
|
|
|
|
Housing
Options Advisor (18 months Fixed Term
Contract)
|
|
|
|
Leasehold
Services Manager
|
Brighton
and Hove City Council
Click
here for
details
|
|
|
Lime Legal
Limited, Greengate House, 87
Pickwick Road, Corsham,
Wiltshire, SN13 9B
|
|
|
|
|